|
2.2.FB's writings on Human Rights
Law
2.2.2. FB's articles on Human Rights
Law
2003.008 ‘Human Rights - A Threat
to Law?' 26(2) UNSWLJ 418 (continued)
HUMAN RIGHTS: A THREAT TO LAW?
Page 419
language of policy: a list of beliefs about an
ideal society.
If a legal right is intended there is no more to be said or done
– except look for it in the law books. It seems however that what
is intended is more likely to be a moral right leading on to a
legal right.
The human rights concept
goes at least as far back as the natural law theories of the ancient
Greeks. Nature to them signified the primordial element from which
the universe was constructed. The earliest Greek philosophers
explained the fabric of creation as the manifestation of some
single principle which they variously asserted to be movement,
force, fire, moisture or generation.
Later Greek philosophers introduced a moral element. The Greek
Stoics sought to live according to nature. This required them
‘to rise above the disorderly habits and gross indulgences of
the vulgar to higher laws of action which nothing but self denial
and self-command would enable the aspirant to observe’.
The ancient Romans agreed that natura
vis maxima (the highest force is that of nature).
Later, Judaism and Christianity substituted for the old Greek
and Roman fabric of creation what might be called the Genesis
version: ‘In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth’.
Sir William Blackstone
said that this meant that man, considered as a creature
(one who has been created), must necessarily be subject
to the laws of God his Creator, ‘for he is entirely a dependent
being’.
Blackstone went on to say that, as man depends absolutely upon
his Maker for everything, it is necessary that he should at all
points conform to his Maker’s will, which is called the law of
nature.
St Paul had said that this was made necessary because God himself
wrote this law in men’s hearts. He even wrote it in the hearts
of non-Jews (known as Gentiles), who were outside the Jewish law:
for when the Gentiles, which
have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law,
these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves; which show
the work of the law written in their hearts.
But how are people to
discover what the law of nature requires? How else but by using
their God-given reasoning powers. These will tell them that the
foremost requirement is justice.
St Augustine said: ‘What are states without justice but robber-bands
enlarged?’
St Thomas Aquinas held that natural law has a twofold application.
First that there are principles of justice which are discoverable
by human reason without the aid of divine revelation, even though
they have a divine origin; second, that man-made laws which conflict
with these principles are invalid. Lex
injusta non est lex (unjust law is not law).
.................Next
page
|