Francis Bennion portraitThe Francis Bennion Website

Home Law Human Rights Politics Professionalism Sexual Ethics Press Letters Poetry Fiction Drama Blogs Other

Google

www this site

CONTENTS OF SITE

 

ABOUT FB

. . . CV

. . . Autobiographical

. . . Life photos

 

FIFTH EDITION 2008

. . . Overview

. . . Updating

. . . Index

. . . Corrigenda

 

FB's OTHER WRITING

. . . Chronological

. . . By subject

. . . Books

. . . Articles etc.

. . . Press letters

. . . Archive

 

OTHER MATERIAL

. . . Non-FB writings

. . . Press cuttings

. . . Reviews

. . . Comments

. . . Documents

. . . All photos

. . . Audio and video

 

BUY Bennion's Books

 

Abbreviations

Contact FB

Contact Webmaster

 

Copyright

Disclaimer

 

Acrobat reader
 
     

Practical Statutory Interpretation: Bennion’s NESSSI Method

 

 

Doc. No. 2008.026

 

Note Version 1 of this file is the version which is currently on my website as 2007.004. Version 2 is on the website as 2008.014.

 

Practical Statutory Interpretation: Bennion’s NESSSI Method

 

Modern legislative drafting in the United Kingdom is logical and precise, though complicated. Francis Bennion, a former Westminster Parliamentary Counsel (Government legislative draftsman) has devised NESSSI, which stands for New Scientific System of Statutory Interpretation. This practical system is not wholly new, but presents a novel rationalization of the existing interpretative criteria. It is based on the method set out in Bennion on Statutory Interpretation (LexisNexis, 5th edn, 2008). Designed for practitioners, NESSSI is also helpful to students.

 

NESSSI postulates that a problem of statutory interpretation needs to be tackled step by step, scientifically. The first step is always to find out and set down the exact wording of a doubtful enactment, stripping it of unnecessary words (that is words which are not relevant to the problem in hand). Then the opposing constructions of the enactment which need to be put forward by either side are worked out. The construction favoured by the client needs to be supported by all relevant interpretative criteria.

 

The interpretative criteria consist of (1) rules of interpretation; (2) principles derived from legal policy; (3) presumptions based on the nature of legislation; and (4) linguistic canons of construction applicable to all types of composition. They resemble the various instruments used by a surgeon in carrying out an operation. There are many different surgical instruments but the surgeon selects only those that are relevant to the operation he or she is conducting.

 

Practical statutory interpretation is also described in other books by Francis Bennion, namely Statute Law (Longman, 3rd edn 1990), Understanding Common Law Legislation, (Oxford University Press, 2002), and the Statutes title in the current version of Halsbury’s Laws of England (LexisNexisButterworths, 4th edition Reissue, 1995, vol. 44(1)).

 

Advice on court technique regarding statutory interpretation is given in Appendix A to Bennion on Statutory Interpretation, while a useful checklist is set out in Appendix B of that work.

 

An example of NESSSI in action is given in Bennion’s article ‘The Real IRA Is Proscribed After All’ in 168 JPN (4 September 2004) 694.

 

On the teaching of statutory interpretation using NESSSI see

www.francisbennion.com/2007/nfb/005.htm.

 

For a case which has used NESSSI (that is where the court has applied the basic rule set out on pages 544-548 of the fifth edition of Bennion on Statutory Interpretation) see The Medical Council of Hong Kong v Shek FACV000003/2000.